Vibe Coding vs. Vibe Engineering
The difference isn't how fast you write. It's how hard you make AI think. Here's the methodology behind building Kvalty.cz.
When people hear “programming with AI,” most imagine a simple process: write a prompt, AI spits out code, done.
That might work for a simple script. But not for a project like Kvalty.cz. There, I apply what I call Vibe Engineering. And it looks completely different.
My process isn’t a monologue. It’s a structured adversarial review.
How It Actually Works
Phase 1: Research & Strategy
I never start with code. My first command is always something like:
“I want to achieve X. Research the current documentation and modern best practices. Create a detailed implementation plan.”
Phase 2: The Roast
Here’s where it gets interesting. I don’t take that plan and start coding.
I take it and throw it at another AI agent with this instruction:
“You’re a senior architect. Critically evaluate this plan. Find security holes, performance bottlenecks, and propose better solutions.”
Phase 3: Consensus
These agents argue with each other (under my guidance). We iterate until we land on a bulletproof design that I’m satisfied with too.
Only then does the first line of code get written.
The Result
Kvalty.cz doesn’t run on the first idea an AI hallucinated. It runs on a solution that went through several rounds of critical review — it just happened in minutes, not weeks.
The Core Insight
Vibe Engineering isn’t about AI doing the work for you. It’s about knowing how to direct, coordinate, and ultimately decide who’s right.
It’s no longer just about writing syntax. It’s about refusing to settle for average, just because it was generated quickly.
Are you using AI as a code generator, or are you forcing it to do its own adversarial review?